Overall | Overall ranking men | w | l | gf | ga | | p | | | 1. Brazil | 52 | 37 | 185: | 147 | | 12 | All | | 2. Soviet Union | 41 | 10 | 137: | 46 | | 7 | All | | 3. Italy | 40 | 23 | 139: | 92 | | 9 | All | | 4. United States | 38 | 27 | 134: | 111 | | 9 | All | | 5. Japan | 32 | 24 | 115: | 90 | | 8 | All | | 6. Bulgaria | 27 | 25 | 100: | 95 | | 7 | All | | 7. Netherlands | 26 | 19 | 89: | 72 | | 6 | All | | 8. Czechoslovakia | 24 | 13 | 83: | 59 | | 5 | All | | 9. Poland | 24 | 20 | 84: | 79 | | 7 | All | | 10.Cuba | 22 | 20 | 79: | 72 | | 6 | All | | 11.Russia | 20 | 12 | 69: | 52 | | 4 | All | | 12.South Korea | 16 | 35 | 71: | 117 | | 8 | All | | 13.Argentina | 15 | 20 | 62: | 73 | | 5 | All | | 14.Yugoslavia | 14 | 8 | 50: | 38 | | 3 | All | | 15.Romania | 14 | 8 | 46: | 34 | | 3 | All | | 16.East Germany | 11 | 5 | 38: | 20 | | 2 | All | | 17.France | 7 | 11 | 29: | 37 | | 3 | All | | 18.Serbia Mont. | 4 | 2 | 13: | 9 | | 1 | All | | 19.Hungary | 4 | 5 | 18: | 18 | | 1 | All | | 20.Spain | 4 | 9 | 20: | 33 | | 1 | All | | 21.Canada | 4 | 12 | 21: | 36 | | 3 | All | | 22.Greece | 3 | 3 | 14: | 12 | | 1 | All | | 23.Sweden | 3 | 4 | 14: | 16 | | 1 | All | | 24.China | 3 | 9 | 13: | 31 | | 2 | All | | 25.Serbia | 2 | 4 | 11: | 13 | | 1 | All | | 26.Belgium | 2 | 7 | 6: | 24 | | 1 | All | | 27.Australia | 2 | 11 | 9: | 34 | | 2 | All | | 28.Venezuela | 1 | 4 | 8: | 12 | | 1 | All | | 29.Germany | 1 | 4 | 6: | 12 | | 1 | All | | 30.West Germany | 1 | 5 | 7: | 16 | | 1 | All | | 31.Tunisia | 1 | 27 | 9: | 83 | | 5 | All | | 32.Libya | 0 | 5 | 0: | 15 | | 1 | All | | 33.Algeria | 0 | 6 | 0: | 18 | | 1 | All | | 34.Mexico | 0 | 9 | 6: | 27 | | 1 | All | | 35.Egypt | 0 | 15 | 3: | 45 | | 4 | All |
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | 2008 | | 1. United States | 8 | 0 | 24: | 9 | 1.149 | A 1. | 2008 | | 2. Brazil | 6 | 2 | 20: | 8 | 1.141 | B 1. | 2008 | | 3. Russia | 6 | 2 | 22: | 11 | 1.095 | B 2. | 2008 | | 4. Italy | 5 | 3 | 17: | 14 | 1.032 | A 2. | 2008 | | 5. Poland | 4 | 2 | 14: | 9 | 1.052 | B 3. | 2008 | | 5. Bulgaria | 3 | 3 | 11: | 12 | 0.991 | A 3. | 2008 | | 5. Serbia | 2 | 4 | 11: | 13 | 0.996 | B 4. | 2008 | | 5. China | 2 | 4 | 9: | 16 | 0.869 | A 4. | 2008 | | 9. Germany | 1 | 4 | 6: | 12 | 0.950 | B 5. | 2008 | | 9. Venezuela | 1 | 4 | 8: | 12 | 0.933 | A 5. | 2008 | | 11.Japan | 0 | 5 | 4: | 15 | 0.875 | A 6. | 2008 | | 11.Egypt | 0 | 5 | 0: | 15 | 0.704 | B 6. | 2008 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf: | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Brazil | 7 | 1 | 22: | 8 | 1.156 | B 1. | 2004 | | 2. Italy | 5 | 3 | 20: | 11 | 1.066 | B 2. | 2004 | | 3. Russia | 5 | 3 | 17: | 13 | 1.021 | B 4. | 2004 | | 4. United States | 4 | 4 | 14: | 16 | 0.975 | B 3. | 2004 | | 5. Serbia Mont. | 4 | 2 | 13: | 9 | 1.050 | A 1. | 2004 | | 5. Greece | 3 | 3 | 14: | 12 | 1.030 | A 2. | 2004 | | 5. Argentina | 3 | 3 | 13: | 12 | 1.018 | A 3. | 2004 | | 5. Poland | 3 | 3 | 10: | 12 | 0.982 | A 4. | 2004 | | 9. France | 2 | 3 | 8: | 10 | 1.028 | A 5. | 2004 | | 9. Netherlands | 2 | 3 | 7: | 11 | 0.938 | B 5. | 2004 | | 11.Tunisia | 0 | 5 | 4: | 15 | 0.827 | A 6. | 2004 | | 11.Australia | 0 | 5 | 2: | 15 | 0.784 | B 6. | 2004 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Yugoslavia | 6 | 2 | 21: | 11 | 1.082 | B 3. | 2000 | | 2. Russia | 6 | 2 | 19: | 13 | 1.039 | B 2. | 2000 | | 3. Italy | 7 | 1 | 21: | 8 | 1.153 | B 1. | 2000 | | 4. Argentina | 3 | 5 | 11: | 18 | 0.898 | B 4. | 2000 | | 5. Netherlands | 6 | 2 | 20: | 8 | 1.123 | A 2. | 2000 | | 6. Brazil | 6 | 2 | 19: | 9 | 1.112 | A 1. | 2000 | | 7. Cuba | 4 | 4 | 16: | 13 | 1.104 | A 3. | 2000 | | 8. Australia | 2 | 6 | 7: | 19 | 0.829 | A 4. | 2000 | | 9. South Korea | 1 | 4 | 8: | 14 | 0.970 | B 5. | 2000 | | 9. Spain | 1 | 4 | 7: | 12 | 0.910 | A 5. | 2000 | | 11.United States | 0 | 5 | 5: | 15 | 0.872 | B 6. | 2000 | | 11.Egypt | 0 | 5 | 1: | 15 | 0.776 | A 6. | 2000 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Netherlands | 7 | 1 | 21: | 6 | 1.394 | B 2. | 1996 | | 2. Italy | 7 | 1 | 23: | 5 | 1.455 | B 1. | 1996 | | 3. Yugoslavia | 5 | 3 | 16: | 14 | 1.113 | B 3. | 1996 | | 4. Russia | 3 | 5 | 11: | 15 | 0.905 | B 4. | 1996 | | 5. Brazil | 5 | 3 | 18: | 10 | 1.112 | A 2. | 1996 | | 6. Cuba | 5 | 3 | 15: | 12 | 1.163 | A 1. | 1996 | | 7. Bulgaria | 4 | 4 | 15: | 16 | 0.957 | A 3. | 1996 | | 8. Argentina | 3 | 5 | 13: | 18 | 0.896 | A 4. | 1996 | | 9. United States | 2 | 3 | 10: | 9 | 1.034 | A 5. | 1996 | | 9. South Korea | 1 | 4 | 3: | 12 | 0.788 | B 5. | 1996 | | 11.Poland | 0 | 5 | 1: | 15 | 0.603 | A 6. | 1996 | | 11.Tunisia | 0 | 5 | 1: | 15 | 0.408 | B 6. | 1996 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Brazil | 8 | 0 | 24: | 3 | 1.491 | B 1. | 1992 | | 2. Netherlands | 4 | 4 | 14: | 14 | 1.124 | B 4. | 1992 | | 3. United States | 6 | 2 | 20: | 13 | 1.114 | A 2. | 1992 | | 4. Cuba | 5 | 3 | 17: | 11 | 1.148 | B 2. | 1992 | | 5. Italy | 6 | 2 | 21: | 8 | 1.322 | A 1. | 1992 | | 6. Japan | 3 | 5 | 13: | 20 | 0.889 | A 4. | 1992 | | 7. Soviet Union | 4 | 4 | 17: | 15 | 1.023 | B 3. | 1992 | | 8. Spain | 3 | 5 | 13: | 21 | 0.870 | A 3. | 1992 | | 9. South Korea | 2 | 4 | 6: | 13 | 0.767 | B 5. | 1992 | | 10.Canada | 1 | 5 | 11: | 15 | 0.985 | A 5. | 1992 | | 11.France | 2 | 4 | 9: | 14 | 0.845 | A 6. | 1992 | | 12.Algeria | 0 | 6 | 0: | 18 | 0.452 | B 6. | 1992 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. United States | 7 | 0 | 21: | 4 | 1.727 | B 1. | 1988 | | 2. Soviet Union | 5 | 2 | 18: | 7 | 1.157 | A 1. | 1988 | | 3. Argentina | 4 | 3 | 14: | 12 | 0.997 | B 2. | 1988 | | 4. Brazil | 4 | 3 | 16: | 13 | 1.133 | A 2. | 1988 | | 5. Netherlands | 5 | 2 | 16: | 9 | 1.114 | B 4. | 1988 | | 6. Bulgaria | 3 | 4 | 10: | 12 | 0.959 | A 4. | 1988 | | 7. Sweden | 3 | 4 | 14: | 16 | 0.897 | A 3. | 1988 | | 8. France | 3 | 4 | 12: | 13 | 1.067 | B 3. | 1988 | | 9. Italy | 4 | 3 | 13: | 13 | 1.131 | A 5. | 1988 | | 10.Japan | 2 | 5 | 10: | 17 | 0.857 | B 5. | 1988 | | 11.South Korea | 2 | 5 | 10: | 17 | 0.862 | A 6. | 1988 | | 12.Tunisia | 0 | 7 | 0: | 21 | 0.432 | B 6. | 1988 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. United States | 5 | 1 | 15: | 4 | 1.633 | A 2. | 1984 | | 2. Brazil | 4 | 2 | 13: | 8 | 1.248 | A 1. | 1984 | | 3. Italy | 4 | 2 | 15: | 7 | 1.212 | B 2. | 1984 | | 4. Canada | 3 | 3 | 10: | 9 | 1.042 | B 1. | 1984 | | 5. South Korea | 5 | 1 | 15: | 8 | 1.233 | A 3. | 1984 | | 6. Argentina | 2 | 4 | 11: | 13 | 0.915 | A 4. | 1984 | | 7. Japan | 4 | 2 | 13: | 8 | 1.106 | B 3. | 1984 | | 8. China | 1 | 5 | 4: | 15 | 0.766 | B 4. | 1984 | | 9. Tunisia | 1 | 4 | 3: | 14 | 0.536 | A 5. | 1984 | | 10.Egypt | 0 | 5 | 2: | 15 | 0.598 | B 5. | 1984 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Soviet Union | 6 | 0 | 18: | 2 | 1.563 | A 1. | 1980 | | 2. Bulgaria | 4 | 2 | 13: | 8 | 1.091 | A 2. | 1980 | | 3. Romania | 4 | 2 | 13: | 9 | 1.213 | B 2. | 1980 | | 4. Poland | 3 | 3 | 12: | 11 | 1.111 | B 1. | 1980 | | 5. Brazil | 4 | 2 | 15: | 10 | 1.139 | B 3. | 1980 | | 6. Yugoslavia | 3 | 3 | 13: | 13 | 1.061 | B 4. | 1980 | | 7. Cuba | 2 | 4 | 11: | 13 | 1.064 | A 3. | 1980 | | 8. Czechoslovakia | 1 | 5 | 7: | 17 | 0.755 | A 4. | 1980 | | 9. Italy | 2 | 3 | 7: | 11 | 0.960 | A 5. | 1980 | | 10.Libya | 0 | 5 | 0: | 15 | 0.133 | B 5. | 1980 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Poland | 6 | 0 | 18: | 9 | 1.290 | A 1. | 1976 | | 2. Soviet Union | 4 | 1 | 14: | 3 | 1.515 | B 1. | 1976 | | 3. Cuba | 4 | 2 | 14: | 7 | 1.321 | A 2. | 1976 | | 4. Japan | 2 | 3 | 8: | 9 | 0.687 | B 2. | 1976 | | 5. Czechoslovakia | 4 | 2 | 13: | 8 | 1.203 | A 3. | 1976 | | 6. South Korea | 2 | 4 | 10: | 13 | 0.832 | A 4. | 1976 | | 7. Brazil | 2 | 3 | 8: | 11 | 0.947 | B 3. | 1976 | | 8. Italy | 0 | 5 | 2: | 15 | 0.504 | B 4. | 1976 | | 9. Canada | 0 | 4 | 0: | 12 | 0.486 | A 5. | 1976 | | 10.Egypt | 0 | 0 | 0: | 0 | | B -. | 1976 |
|
| Final ranking | w | l | gf | ga | ratio | gr. | | 1. Japan | 7 | 0 | 21: | 3 | 1.812 | B 1. | 1972 | | 2. East Germany | 5 | 2 | 16: | 8 | 1.152 | B 2. | 1972 | | 3. Soviet Union | 6 | 1 | 19: | 6 | 1.189 | A 1. | 1972 | | 4. Bulgaria | 4 | 3 | 15: | 14 | 1.112 | A 2. | 1972 | | 5. Romania | 4 | 3 | 14: | 10 | 1.049 | B 3. | 1972 | | 6. Czechoslovakia | 4 | 3 | 15: | 9 | 1.172 | A 3. | 1972 | | 7. South Korea | 3 | 4 | 10: | 13 | 1.052 | A 4. | 1972 | | 8. Brazil | 2 | 5 | 9: | 19 | 0.847 | B 4. | 1972 | | 9. Poland | 2 | 4 | 11: | 12 | 1.004 | A 5. | 1972 | | 10.Cuba | 2 | 4 | 6: | 16 | 0.437 | B 5. | 1972 | | 11.West Germany | 1 | 5 | 7: | 16 | 0.730 | B 6. | 1972 | | 12.Tunisia | 0 | 6 | 1: | 18 | 0.437 | A 6. | 1972 |
|
| Final Ranking | w | l | pf | pa | ratio | gr. | | 1. Soviet Union | 8 | 1 | 26: | 8 | 1.423 | | 1968 | | 2. Japan | 7 | 2 | 24: | 6 | 1.667 | | 1968 | | 3. Czechoslovakia | 7 | 2 | 22: | 15 | 1.089 | | 1968 | | 4. East Germany | 6 | 3 | 22: | 12 | 1.201 | | 1968 | | 5. Poland | 6 | 3 | 18: | 11 | 1.320 | | 1968 | | 6. Bulgaria | 4 | 5 | 16: | 17 | 0.984 | | 1968 | | 7. United States | 4 | 5 | 15: | 18 | 0.925 | | 1968 | | 8. Belgium | 2 | 7 | 6: | 24 | 0.587 | | 1968 | | 9. Brazil | 1 | 8 | 8: | 25 | 0.587 | | 1968 | | 10.Mexico | 0 | 9 | 6: | 27 | 0.572 | | 1968 |
|
| Final Ranking | w | l | pf | pa | ratio | gr. | | 1. Soviet Union | 8 | 1 | 25: | 5 | 1.487 | | 1964 | | 2. Czechoslovakia | 8 | 1 | 26: | 10 | 1.218 | | 1964 | | 3. Japan | 7 | 2 | 22: | 12 | 1.277 | | 1964 | | 4. Romania | 6 | 3 | 19: | 15 | 1.096 | | 1964 | | 5. Bulgaria | 5 | 4 | 20: | 16 | 1.082 | | 1964 | | 6. Hungary | 4 | 5 | 18: | 18 | 0.964 | | 1964 | | 7. Brazil | 3 | 6 | 13: | 23 | 0.865 | | 1964 | | 8. Netherlands | 2 | 7 | 11: | 24 | 0.784 | | 1964 | | 9. United States | 2 | 7 | 10: | 23 | 0.800 | | 1964 | | 10.South Korea | 0 | 9 | 9: | 27 | 0.752 | | 1964 |
|
|
Prepared and maintained by Todor Krastev
todor1966@yahoo.com
Last updated: 1 May 2026
Facebook Todor Krastev
|
| 